Twice-daily tides
A Socratic walk-through of twice-daily tides — reasoned out one step at a time, not lectured.
The question we started with
THE QUESTION #Why does the sea rise twice a day when there is only one Moon pulling on it?
One Moon, on one side of the Earth, pulling one way. The obvious prediction is one bulge of water facing it, and one high tide as your coast rotates beneath it. Instead most coasts get two, about twelve hours and twenty-five minutes apart. There is water heaped up on the side facing away from the Moon, where its pull is weakest. That is the awkward fact, and any account that does not explain it has not explained tides.
Reasoning it through
REASONING #Begin with the one thing gravity certainly does: it weakens with distance. The Earth is nearly thirteen thousand kilometres wide, so the near face sits about three per cent closer to the Moon than the far face. Small, but the Moon does not pull equally on the two.
Now ask a question that sounds like a technicality and is actually the whole answer: what is the Earth doing? It is not anchored. It is in free fall toward the Moon, exactly as the Moon is toward it. And in free fall, a uniform pull is not felt at all — an astronaut in orbit is being pulled hard by the Earth and floats regardless, because everything around her is falling at the same rate.
So what can be felt? Only the difference from the average. If a piece of ocean is pulled harder than the Earth as a whole is being accelerated, it goes ahead of the Earth. If it is pulled less, the Earth goes ahead of it. Do you see where that leads?
Take the near side. It is closer, so the Moon pulls it harder than average — it moves moonward relative to Earth's centre. That bulge was expected.
Now take the far side. It is further away, so it is pulled less than average. The solid Earth accelerates moonward and leaves it behind. Relative to the Earth's centre it drifts away from the Moon — which is to say, outward, away from the ground. A second bulge, produced by weakness rather than by pull.
That is the entire mechanism, and notice it needed no spin. The near side is pulled more than the centre, the far side less, and both differences point outward from the centre. Squeeze in at the sides, stretch out at the ends: the Earth is being pulled taut, not tugged.
How strong is it? At each end, the residual works out at a little over one micrometre per second squared — roughly one part in nine million of ordinary surface gravity. Absurdly feeble to lift a rock, but the ocean is a fluid spread across a hemisphere, and a whisper applied over that area, twice a day for ages, is enough to move it.
Then the Earth turns. Rotate any coast through this fixed double-ended pattern and it passes two bulges per rotation. Why twelve hours and twenty-five minutes rather than twelve exactly? Because while you rotated, the Moon moved on in its month-long orbit, so it takes about fifty extra minutes to come back overhead.
The analogy
THE ANALOGY #Picture a line of skydivers in free fall, holding hands one below another. Nobody is pulling them apart — gravity pulls them all the same way. But the lowest is fractionally closer to the Earth and falls a little faster, and the highest fractionally further and falls a little slower. Relative to the person in the middle, the chain stretches at both ends at once.
Skydivers meet air resistance and can grip harder, whereas the ocean has neither; and the stretch in the analogy is a steady pull, while real tides are not a static heap of water at all but waves being driven around ocean basins.
Clarifying the model
THE MODEL #That last clause matters enough to spend the rest of this section on, along with a correction.
The correction first. You will often read that the far bulge comes from centrifugal force as the Earth swings about the Earth-Moon barycentre. Something can be salvaged from that account in a rotating frame if it is done carefully, but as a primary explanation it is misleading, and it teaches the wrong thing. The far bulge does not require the pair to be rotating at all: two bodies simply released and falling straight toward each other would show the same stretch. The cause is the gradient of the Moon's gravity across the Earth's width, full stop.
Now the honest limitation of everything above. The picture just built is the "equilibrium tide", and it gets the pattern right and the reality wrong. It predicts a rise of about half a metre, and it predicts high water when the Moon is overhead. Neither is what tide tables show.
The reason is that the ocean cannot instantly settle into that shape. Continents are in the way, and the bulge would have to travel westward faster than a shallow-water wave can propagate. So what actually happens is that the tidal force acts as a rhythmic driver on the ocean basins, and each basin responds according to its own size, depth, and natural period — in effect, resonance. Water rotates around fixed nodes called amphidromic points, pushed by the Coriolis effect. The Bay of Fundy, whose geometry happens to ring in near-tune with the semidiurnal rhythm, sees a range of some sixteen metres. Much of the Mediterranean barely notices the tide. And in parts of the Gulf of Mexico and Southeast Asia, the basin responds better to the once-daily component of the forcing than the twice-daily one, so those coasts get a single tide a day — which is precisely why "twice daily" is a description of the driving force rather than a law about coastlines.
One more piece: the Sun does the same thing, at about 46 per cent of the Moon's strength. When the two line up we get the larger spring tides, and when they act at right angles the smaller neaps.
A picture of it
THE PICTURE #How to readEach bar is a point along the line from the near face of the Earth, through the centre, to the far face, and its height is the Moon's pull there minus the pull at the centre, in micrometres per second squared. The centre bar is zero by definition — that is the reference the whole planet is falling at. The positive bar on the left means the near side is dragged moonward, and the negative bar on the right means the far side is left behind, which points it away from the Moon. Both are directed outward from the Earth's centre, and that is the two bulges: one from surplus, one from deficit.
What became clearer
WHAT CLEARED #Tides are not caused by the Moon's pull. They are caused by the difference in the Moon's pull across the Earth, and a difference has two ends. The near side is pulled more than average and moves toward the Moon, the far side less than average and gets left behind, and both amount to stretching outward from the centre. Whether your particular coast then sees two tides, or one, or sixteen metres of them, is a question about the shape of your ocean basin rather than about the Moon.
Where to go next
ONWARD #- How tidal friction is slowing the Earth's rotation and pushing the Moon steadily further away.
- Why the same differential force, taken to an extreme, tears bodies apart near a massive object.
Key terms
TERMS #| Term | What it means |
|---|---|
| Tidal force | the residual pull on a body once the average pull on its centre is subtracted, always stretching along the line to the attractor. |
| Equilibrium tide | the idealised static two-bulge shape the ocean would take if it could respond instantly, useful for the pattern but not the size. |
| Amphidromic point | a node in an ocean basin around which the tidal wave rotates and where the range is near zero. |
| Spring and neap tides | the larger and smaller tides produced when the Sun's tidal effect adds to, or works across, the Moon's. |
Every term the collection defines is gathered in the glossary.